Dense development of the Upper West Side largely
occurred in the last two decades of the 19th century.
The arrival of the Ninth Avenue elevated rail line
in 1879 opened the neighborhood to upwardly mobile
middle class families. By the end of the 1920s building
boom, Central Park West, West End Avenue and Riverside
Drive were lined with fashionable high-rise apartment
houses, while the cross streets were dominated
by low-rise brownstones.
The economic travails of the
1930s lead to subdivision of many of the rooms in the
area as well as poor maintenance for buildings overall.
After World War II, African-Americans and Hispanic immigrants
replaced middle-class Irish and Jewish residents as the housing
stock and quality of life in the community continued to deteriorate
(Gratz, 2010, pp 199)
The West Side Urban Renewal began in 1955 when Mayor Robert F. Wagner directed
James Felt of the City Planning Commission to study housing deterioration and
social unrest on the West Side (NHCPC, 1979, pp 1-3). The commission issued its study
in April of 1958 and released a preliminary plan for the West Side Renewal Area
in May of 1959. The area covered 20 blocks bounded by 87th Street on the South,
97th Street on the North, Amsterdam Avenue on the West and Central Park West
on the East.
In contrast to the wholesale clearance and rebuild approach of Robert Moses
that was used for Lincoln Center to the south and Park West Village to the
North, Felt's approach was to selectively demolish targeted structures for
private redevelopment (largely along the avenues) while retaining and
renovating many of the area's attractive but poorly maintained brownstone
structures. The process ended up taking over 15 years longer than planned, with
at least two brownstones lingering in dereliction as late as 1995
(Rozhon 1995).
The project can, in some respects, be regarded as a success,
with the area becoming one of the city's most desirable (and expensive)
by the dawn of the 21st century, although giving the West Side Urban Renewal
project sole credit for the revitalization may be a bit of an oversimplification.
Wilson (1979)
makes a detailed analysis of the transformation by considering
the physical, economic, social and institutional environment as well as issues
of power and class.
Gratz (2010) argues that the neighborhood was saved by its own
virtues (parks, transportation, shopping) IN SPITE of the highly disruptive urban
renewal projects foisted upon it. And if
Jacobs (1964, pp 187-199) is to be
believed, escalating rents as well as homogenious age and architecture
may have planted the seeds of the neighborhood's cyclical destruction.
The preliminary plan (linked below) is a fascinating read. Colorful,
attractive and full of certitude, it in may ways reads like a contemporary
piece of urban planning rhetoric. It's not difficult to imagine the book's
outlandish promises coming out of the mouth of Michael Bloomberg, albeit
from a firmly privatized rather than public context.
This photo tour roughly follows a loop up Columbus Avenue and back
down Amsterdam Avenue