The Global Positioning System (GPS)
The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based system that enables accurate capture of location anyplace on the surface of the planet. While radio navigation aids for aviation have been used since 1908 and the first military satellite-based navigation system became operational in 1964, the deployment of the Global Positioning System beginning in 1978 has made location tracking an integral part of commercial, military and private life in the developed world.
There are other systems besides the US GPS system and satellite navigation systems are sometimes referred to by the more generic name global navigation satellite system (GNSS). However, the term GPS is common in popular usage to refer to satellite navigation in general.
While we commonly think of GPS as a collection of satellites, it is more helpful to think of GPS as a system with three segments:
The space segment consists of a constellation of 32 satellites, each in a circular orbit 12,552 miles above the earth that takes 11 hours and 58 minutes to go around the earth. The satellites contain extremely accurate atomic clocks and transmit signals with the time of transmission and the location and orbit of the satellite on 1,575.42 mHz and 1,227.6 mHz.
The control segment is a set of ground stations that manage the satellites. These facilities include:
- A master control station at Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, CO
- Six original monitor stations located at Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado, Cape Canaveral, Florida, Hawaii, Ascension Island in the Atlantic Ocean, Diego Garcia Atoll in the Indian Ocean, and Kwajalein Island in the South Pacific Ocean
- Six additional stations added in 2005 in Argentina, Bahrain, United Kingdom, Ecuador, Washington DC, and Australia
- Four ground antennas for capturing GPS signals
The user segment is the GPS receivers that actually use the GPS signals to find location. GPS receivers range from inexpensive receivers in cellphones to complex, highly-accurate receivers used in surveying.
Ordinary GPS receivers need to be able to receive signals from four different satellites.
Because radio signals travel at the speed of light, there is a delay between the time the signal is transmitted by the satellite and the time the signal is received by the receiver. Because the satellites' clocks are synchronized, and the signals contain the time of transmission and location in orbit when the signals are transmitted (ephemeris data), the GPS receiver can use the differences in delays between the signals along with 3-dimensional geometric calculations to determine the latitude, longitude and elevation of the receiver.
This process is called trilateration. While the tri part of that term implies three, and it is possible to calculate location from GPS signals if the receiver has a high-precision clock, most consumer-level GPS receivers do not have such clocks and need four signals to accurately calculate location.
GPS receivers calculate time, latitude, longitude and elevation based on the WGS84 datum, although high-end receivers can transform and display coordinates in other datums and coordinate systems.
GPS Availability and Accuracy
There are numerous factors that affect the availability and accuracy of GPS location calculation. Some of these are minor for casual GPS use, but the can be important when highly accurate GPS locations are needed (as in surveying).
- Line of sight: GPS signals will not travel through the earth or thick structures. Since the satellites are constantly in orbit around the planet, only a handful are visible at any given time. If view of some or all satellites is blocked by hills or buildings, even fewer satellites will be visible. This is why GPS does not work inside most buildings and can be sporadic in urban areas with tall buildings.
- Atmospheric interference: Atmospheric conditions like ionization and water vapor can slightly change the travel speed of GPS signals. While some of these conditions are predictable and can be compensated for in the location calculations, others are unpredictable and add inaccuracy to GPS coordinates.
- Position dilution of precision (PDOP): Trilateration is most accurate when satellites being used are far apart. However, in cases where only a handful of closely spaced satellites can be seen by the receiver, less precision is possible. Some high-end receivers will report relative-error so you can assess the suitability of the reported location for your purposes.
- Multipath effects: In dense urban areas with lots of large, tall buildings, GPS signals can reflect off the buildings. In some cases, the combination of reflected and direct signal is a garbled signal that the receiver cannot interpret. In other cases, only the reflected signal with additional delay is received, which results in inaccurate location calculations that are based on delay.
Ways to Improve GPS Accuracy
There are a number of technological add-ons to GPS that give it faster and more-accurate location capabilities.
Assisted GPS (A-GPS): Most contemporary smartphones have ability to use additional information from other radio signals along with GPS signals to estimate location:
- Cell-phone towers have precise GPS coordinates, and GPS receivers can trilaterate based on the strength of signals coming from different cell-phone towers to estimate location
- The towers on some cell-phone networks transmit GPS-synchronized time. Having accurate time relative to the distance-delayed GPS signals makes calculating distance to the satellites (and, therefore, location) faster and easier
- Wi-Fi networks have unique hardware identification numbers that are included in the signals they transmit. By sending those hardware ID numbers along with the relative strengths of those Wi-Fi signals to a service that tracks the location of Wi-Fi access points, an additional estimate of location can be made
Differential GPS (DGPS): The US Coast Guard maintains the NDGPS system, a series of 84 remote broadcast sites at known locations that constantly receive GPS signals and then broadcast information about how far the currently received GPS signals at that location deviate from the known locations of the broadcast sites. This allows GPS users near the broadcast stations to compensate for atmospheric effects and PDOP. Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) is a program similar to DGPS run by the US Army.
Satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS) are similar to DGPS but use non-GPS satellites to transmit differential information. The Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) is an SBAS system run by the Federal Aviation Administration to improve GPS accuracy in aircraft navigation.
Non-US GNSS Systems
GLONASS is a Russian GNSS system which began deployment in 1982 and, after a decline in capacity during the economic and political chaos of the 1990s, was fully restored to a 24-satellite constellation in 2011.
Galileo is a European GNSS system that began deployment in 2011 and is scheduled for completion in 2020.
BeiDou (aka Compass) is a Chinese GNSS system that began deployment in 2000 and currently has regional coverage over China and its immediate neighbors. A full global system is scheduled for completion in 2020.
GPS Security and Reliability Issues
The increasing use of GPS by a variety of business in mission-critical applications (including transportation systems) raises concerns about the security and future of the Global Positioning System.
A 2011 report by the US Department of Homeland Security noted that, The increasing convergence of critical infrastructure dependency on GPS services with the likelihood that threat actors will exploit their awareness of that dependency presents a growing risk to the United States.
GPS was originally a military system and GPS is now integral to modern warfare. Accordingly, the military has to consider:
- Vulnerability of GPS to jamming, spoofing and hacking
- Vulnerability of satellites to failure or physical destruction
- Contingencies for operations if GPS is degraded or denied
There is even the possibility that the failure of government leaders to adequately fund critical system maintenance and upgrades could lead to system degredation or failure. A 2009 GAO report questioned whether the Air Force will be able to acquire new satellites in time to maintain current GPS service without interruption. While that crisis seems to have abated, given the sclerotic political climate in Washington and the long-range planning needed to keep GPS functioning, it is not inconceivable that the worst enemy of GPS may end up not being a foreign force, but ourselves.